Steckergehäusesockel (6-polig) | Porsche 911 / 964 / 928 / 944 – OEM

Steckergehäusesockel (6-polig) | Porsche 911 / 964 / 928 / 944 – OEM

Marsoni

M251S

$31.95

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Steckergehäusesockel (6-polig) | Porsche 911 / 964 / 928 / 944 – OEM6 poliger Steckergehusesockel OEM Erstausrsterqualitt Steckergehusesockel in OEM Erstausrsterqualitt fr Porsche Klassiker. Dieses Bauteil aus PA12 Nylon gewhrleistet eine sichere elektrische Verbindung und hohe Bestndigkeit gegenber Umwelteinflssen. Diagramm Referenz Nr. 16. Vergleichsnummern: 91161286702, 91161286801

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Steckergehäusesockel (6-polig) | Porsche 911 / 964 / 928 / 944 – OEM orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Steckergehäusesockel (6-polig) | Porsche 911 / 964 / 928 / 944 – OEM ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Steckergehäusesockel (6-polig) | Porsche 911 / 964 / 928 / 944 – OEM, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Steckergehäusesockel (6-polig) | Porsche 911 / 964 / 928 / 944 – OEM in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I purchased these to wear inside lowcut slip on casual shoes, I don't particularly like to not wear socks in my shoes for hygienic reasons. Prior to purchasing these socks, all I could find were those made of very light beige hosiery type material , and my slip on shoes would slide around a bit. These are light weight and breathable athletic type material, with a very good gripper strip at the heel. One pair of my slip on casual shoes have a particularly lower cut in the toe area, but the shoe is black and I chose the black color and though I see a hint of the sock there, it matches and does not detract from the look of the casual solid black shoe

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2026

Verified Purchase

Anna Wylda

Fort Morgan, US

★★★★★ 5

They stay out! No more sock wads!

Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray

Best no show socks ever made!!!!! I've been struggling for 2 years to find ones that actually stay on your foot, even other national brands, and I just became content wearing my sneakers without socks. They ALWAYS slid down into my show & I ended up walking on a wad of sock until I could fix it...or usually just took them off after a couple of tries. Enter Under Armor!!! They a mid weight, but not very thick & still breathable. They work too by actually staying on your foot! Not once have they slid down into my show!! Very comfortable but they could be a little more affordable.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 1, 2025

Verified Purchase

Rebekah

Dallas, US

★★★★★ 5

Love!

Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray

Ive tried so many no show socks but I love these. This is the 3rd set I've bought. They never slip off and the material is thin and breathable. Perfect for working out.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026

Verified Purchase

Becky

Draper, US

★★★★★ 5

True no-show socks that don’t slide down!

Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray, Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray

This is the first pair of no-show socks I’ve tried that actually don’t slide down into my shoes. Trust me… I have tried lots of different pairs and this is the one! They fit perfectly. They’re not too thick and they’re obviously durable because I wash them after each wear, so daily.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026