Skip to content

K.O. Peppiatt, 10 Shilling,Y62E 075595 ( Dugg. B.251) Emergency Issue Series 2nd April 1940

Marsoni M251S
Sale price$22.00
Pay 4 payments of $5.50 a month.Shop Pay
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29
K.O. Peppiatt, 10 Shilling,Y62E 075595 ( Dugg. B.251) Emergency Issue Series 2nd April 1940During the Second World War, the Bank of England felt the need to protect its currency from counterfeiters. It decided to change the colours of the 1 and 10 shilling notes for the duration of the war and add a revolutionary (at the time) inner metal security thread. The 1 changed from Green to Blue Pink and the 10 shillings from Red Brown to Mauve. The basic design was unchanged from the pre 1940 10 Shilling note. Printed by offset litho at St Lukes's
Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your K.O. Peppiatt, 10 Shilling,Y62E 075595 ( Dugg. B.251) Emergency Issue Series 2nd April 1940 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

  • Standard: 3-7 business days
  • Fast: 2-3 business days
  • Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your K.O. Peppiatt, 10 Shilling,Y62E 075595 ( Dugg. B.251) Emergency Issue Series 2nd April 1940 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about K.O. Peppiatt, 10 Shilling,Y62E 075595 ( Dugg. B.251) Emergency Issue Series 2nd April 1940, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for K.O. Peppiatt, 10 Shilling,Y62E 075595 ( Dugg. B.251) Emergency Issue Series 2nd April 1940 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 2253 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Consumer Reports
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Fit great
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Halo Gray
Been a couple of months and they seem to be holding up nicely. Real picky about fit of socks and these fit well. They are very thin but very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2024
B
Verified Purchase
Broussard Household.
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Always a win
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Under armor is always a win! Comfortable, no peeling, true to size, no squeezing around the arch of foot & affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
tab
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gustavo Garcia
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
ViperMageEx
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products