


WSM Polaris 300-500 - 3 Position Fuel Valve '97-'03 006-602 OE 7052154
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
WSM Polaris 300-500 - 3 Position Fuel Valve '97-'03 006-602 OE 7052154ITEM#: 006 602 FUEL VALVE, 3 POSITION POLARIS 300 500 97 03 OEM#: 7052154 1 4 barbs BRAND: WSM FITMENTS: Make Model Year(s) Polaris Magnum 2X4 500 1999 Polaris Scrambler 2X4 400 2000 2002 Polaris Scrambler 4X4 400 1998 2000,2002 Polaris Sport 400 1998 1999 Polaris Trail Blazer 400 2003 Polaris Trail Boss 325 2000 2001 Polaris Xplorer 400 1998 2002 Polaris Xplorer 2X4 300 1997 1999 Polaris Xpress 300 1997 1999 Polaris Xpress 400 1997 NOTE: 1 4 BARBS
Quick Dispatch:
Your WSM Polaris 300-500 - 3 Position Fuel Valve '97-'03 006-602 OE 7052154 orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your WSM Polaris 300-500 - 3 Position Fuel Valve '97-'03 006-602 OE 7052154 ships.
Need Help?
Questions about WSM Polaris 300-500 - 3 Position Fuel Valve '97-'03 006-602 OE 7052154, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for WSM Polaris 300-500 - 3 Position Fuel Valve '97-'03 006-602 OE 7052154 in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 1964 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Showstopper
We got so many compliments on our outfits. I wore this for our Daddy/Daughter dance and plan to take it on a cruise later this year. The jacket is great quality and a little on the heavy side with all the sequins. It fit perfect in the shoulders and chest. It was a little long on the sleeves for my taste but I just tucked them under and managed for the night. For reference I’m 5’10” tall and 175lbs with athletic build. I bought a large.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 22, 2024
★★★★★ 1
Missing Sequins and Threadbare!
Size: 3X-Large, Color: Purple, Size: 3X-Large, Color: Purple
Jacket is great for fit, and is overall okay, but there are large patches where no sequins are attached! For the $59.99 price I paid, I am definitely feeling very disappointed in the quality of the jacket. Of course, I didn’t realize this till after the return window closed! If you order, do yourself the favor and check to make sure the jacket is in good quality!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Fun jacket
Size: XX-Large, Color: Purple
Fun jacket, fit like they said
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice suit great value
Size: Medium, Color: Light Blue, Size: Medium, Color: Light Blue
Got this suit for my son to wear to a wedding. It arrived a day or two then the except it delivery. I was concerned if it would fit because of the size chart. He is tall and skinny so I got the medium. When he tried it on it fit him perfectly except the waist was a tad too big but with a belt everything worked. I took it to the cleaned to have them press it. Great value, nice quality material, light weight and comfortable for spring/summer events. The wedding was outdoors. He looked very handsome unit. Was very pleased.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Not Seersucker, more a Blue pinstriped suit.
Size: XX-Large, Color: Blue
This is not Seersucker!!
Granted the suit will be cool in summer and looks good, but material is a blend.
The pants are very large, while the top fits perfectly.
I’d go with a regular cut, not slim for better fit. But for the price, no complaints.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 23, 2026