WSM Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings 010-970-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY OEM 4XV-11603-00

WSM Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings 010-970-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY OEM 4XV-11603-00

Marsoni

M251S

$27.24

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

WSM Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings 010-970-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY OEM 4XV-11603-00Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings Rings are top quality RIK Japanese high performance rings. Will fit ALL OEM factory pistons. 1mm OVER SIZE ONLY OEM #: 4XV 11603 00 Make Model CC HP Year Yamaha FX 1000 2005 Yamaha FX 1000 2006 Yamaha FX 1000 2007 Yamaha FX 1000 2008 Yamaha FX 140 1000 2002 Yamaha FX 140 1000 2003 Yamaha FX 140 1000 2004 Yamaha FX Cruiser 1000 2003 Yamaha FX Cruiser 1000 2004 Yamaha FX Cruiser 1000 2005 Yamaha FX Cruiser 1000 2006 Yamaha FX

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your WSM Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings 010-970-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY OEM 4XV-11603-00 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your WSM Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings 010-970-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY OEM 4XV-11603-00 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about WSM Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings 010-970-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY OEM 4XV-11603-00, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for WSM Yamaha 1000 FX Piston Rings 010-970-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY OEM 4XV-11603-00 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I had expected a more fitted and supportive sock. These were replacing some older ones that apparently UA doesn't make anymore. Next time I will look into a more running specific brand. After wearing them a bit more, the fit is loose, there isn't much compression or support, and the light gray looks unclean. They are soft, but that's about it.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026

Verified Purchase

Liz Speno

West Palm Beach, US

★★★★★ 5

Great socks

My husband will only wear 100% cotton socks none of the spandex moisture control etc so these are hard to find in stores but he loves them and they last a while

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2025

Verified Purchase

Steven M.

Carnegie, US

★★★★★ 5

Great feel, amazing tech, and perfect fit

Size: Large, Color: Black/Gray (6 Pairs)

I've been purchasing the white w/grey toe socks for most of my adult life. Never really understood why I'd want anything else. Saw these as an Amazon suggestion one day and figured I'd give them a shot. Oh my freaking feet have never been happier!!! I imagine that the fabrics used by UA to wick away sweat and odor are what makes these socks so comfortable, but I would be lying if I said I understood why they were so amazing. They slip on effortlessly and hug your foot throughout the day. Unlike the socks I used to purchase, these do not lose their shape after a full day of wear and exercise. They also have ample thickness to protect my feet while I'm running from any rubbing or hot spots from my shoes. I imagine this has a lot to do with the fact that they maintain their shape and do not move/slip around while wearing. I was a bit hesitant to purchase black running socks at first, but they hide right below my shoe line and are even less noticeable than my old white w/grey toe socks I used to purchase. I am not certain what "charged cotton" means, but if it means amazing feel, great features (wick away sweat; fight odor), and all for a reasonable price. I'm in. Overall, if you're looking for a nice pair of socks to wear throughout the day or while doing your workout, you would be remiss in not giving these UA socks a shot.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 1, 2017