Loader Tine - 600 MM, Thread Size: M22 X 1.50 (H - Fluted) - Sparex Part S.130800

Marsoni

M251S

$41.83

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Loader Tine - 600 MM, Thread Size: M22 X 1.50 (H - Fluted) - Sparex Part S.130800Loader Tine 600mm, Thread Size: M22 x 1. 50 (H Fluted) S. 130800 Introducing the high quality Loader Tine, designed for optimal performance and durability. With a length of 600mm and a thread size of M22 x 1. 50, this loader tine is perfect for various agricultural and industrial applications. Engineered to meet the highest standards, it ensures reliable operation and longevity. Product Specifications Product Type Loader Tine SKU SP 130800 Thread Size

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Loader Tine - 600 MM, Thread Size: M22 X 1.50 (H - Fluted) - Sparex Part S.130800 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Loader Tine - 600 MM, Thread Size: M22 X 1.50 (H - Fluted) - Sparex Part S.130800 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Loader Tine - 600 MM, Thread Size: M22 X 1.50 (H - Fluted) - Sparex Part S.130800, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Loader Tine - 600 MM, Thread Size: M22 X 1.50 (H - Fluted) - Sparex Part S.130800 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Color is fantastic. Very naked feeling. Runs big. I’m a size 12/14 and usually wear XL with them sometimes feeling tight. I am pear shaped - 35” waist, 47” hip and these fit but were quite loose in the waist. I might consider sizing down if I wanted to tighter. They would be very a bump-friendly non-maternity option

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026