


88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-HubProduct Details : 88A13 Weld On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2. 753" Bore To Fit Our Y Hub Part No: C88YY13 Product Type: Weld On Conveyor Chain Sprocket Sprocket No.: 88A13 Chain No.: 88 Bore: Stock Bore Bore Size: 2. 753" To Fit Our Y Hub No. Of Teeth: 13 Pitch: 2. 609" Pitch Diameter: 10. 9" Plate Thickness: 0. 862" Material(s): Carbon Steel *Please note 88 Sprockets above fit the following chains: (H78, H78RT, WR78, H74, 81X, C188, SS188, 88K) For any
Quick Dispatch:
Your 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub ships.
Need Help?
Questions about 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for 88A13 Weld-On Conveyor Chain Sprocket 2.753" Bore To Fit Our Y-Hub in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 1297 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
I recommend them
Color: Black/Deep Blue/Red/Deep Grey, Size: Small
I bought it for my 11-year-old son who is 5'4" tall and weighs 124 pounds, and they fit him perfectly. It doesn't roll up and it has good elasticity
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
High Quality
Color: White, Size: Medium
High quality material, very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Fits good
Color: White, Size: XX-Large
The fit is very good, doesn’t feel irregular.
Nice comfy fit and feel.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Finally boy shorts done right
Color: (6 Pack) Brown and Pink, Size: 5X-Large
So am going to be one of those, cause I do wished I had one of these reviews to fall on. First off, I am extremely picky about my panties. I am a large person. So comfort is a necessity. I have to have stretch, but also they have to be tight enough to not move or show things. I like longer legs, stretch, and seamless silky soft material. After YEARS of hunting, I did find some perfect ones from a big brand (Aerie) which are wildly overpriced at $23 per PAIR! Found these and they are perfect. Only difference is these have the thin waistband and the Aerie has the wide yoga waistband. I love these so much I bought 6 packs because I know how hard it’s to find the perfect boy shorts for larger women. Smooth, comfortable, seamless, long, and affordable! I did have to size up 2 sizes. In the other brand a xxxl is perfect.. I got a 5x in these. Probably could have went with the 4x but the 5x gives comfort. Im so glad I did find these.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
The underwear of all underwear!
Color: (3 Pack) Leopard Print, Size: X-Large
These have quickly become my favorite underwear and even my go-to shorts for lounging around the house. They’re incredibly comfortable and don’t dig in or roll down like so many others I’ve tried. The fit stays in place, and the fabric has a smooth, silky feel that’s really nice against the skin. They’re comfortable enough to wear all day and have held up well so far. I’d definitely recommend them if you’re looking for something soft, comfortable, and easy to wear
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 30, 2026